If True, share your experience please.True or False: You've Had A Black Eye?
true! from a dude! cause i will talk my sheet and he told me if i did not shut up he was gonna punch me and i kept talking. he was talking lies about me and i was flabbergasted that he would say such things when he had so much about him to be exposed. he kept going so did i, except he was getting heated, and couldn't take it. he was lost minded to think i was gonna let him clown me w/o getting it back! any wayyyyyyyyys my first and only shiner was from a guy and trust me he got a run for his money!True or False: You've Had A Black Eye?
I almost did. You see, I was the goalie, and the ball came straight at me, and hit me smack on my left eye and slightly on my nose. It didn't actually bruise, but it hurt! And that's true.
True. I had two black eyes after some dental surgery.
false I have never had an black eye
false
false - never
True. Got punched in the eye with someones fist.
False--I've had pink eye
false
true....kicked by my friends lil sister(like 14yrs ago)
haven't had one since=(
True. I fell out of the bath many years ago and whacked my cheek bone on the sink. I woke up with a black eye and a shiner !!
I trod on a rake at a allotment, blackened my eye and broke my nose it was horrendous
true I got one on my 26th birthday and don't know how
false..
False
False.
door knob, i was hiding, then someone opened the door and kaboom!!
false!
i have not had a black eye. my daughter came home from college with a black eye. she walked home and a boy hit her. my grandson fall in the bath and got a black eye.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Why do some Christians call Catholics false Christians? Do they have an ember in their eye?
Because Catholics aren't biblical and therefore are not ChristiansWhy do some Christians call Catholics false Christians? Do they have an ember in their eye?
Jesus answered, ';I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.( John 14:6) This plainly says Jesus is the only way to heaven.Why do some Christians call Catholics false Christians? Do they have an ember in their eye?
Not necessarily.
Many of them are simply easily deceived, and the rest obviously don't care enough to learn the truth.
In today's information age, there's really no excuse for either position.
Anyone can do the authentic research and easily prove that the Catholic Church is everything Jesus set out to make it, and more.
The guys who claim to be ex-Catholics really crack me up. They're either liars or fools. Nobody really knows which. Not even them.
Everyone needs an enemy, it seems. Let Christianity destroy itself via petty disputes.
Christians who judge other for there beliefs are not real Christians. The Catholic church dose disagree with other forms of Christianity but it dose not judge them.
';Let he who is without sin cast the first stone';
Are they Christians themselves, eh?
Most people who call Catholics false Christians aren't Christians either.
Mandy957 is badly misinformed. Non- Catholic Western Christians believe that the bible is the only source of authority for what we are to believe. Orthodox and Catholic Christians believe that the bishops are that authority. These same bishops have defined what is to believed in the scriptures and in the General Councils of the bishops. Since Western Non-Catholic Christians have rejected the belief in a priesthood who still carries out the priesthood of Christ, they must reject the authority of the bishops and the General Councils.
I'm an ex-Catholic.
It's a long story, theologically, but I'll try to give you a condensed version.
The Catholic Church really is just what the Roman Empire morphed into, as a survival tactic.
Constantine created it, and wasn't ';really'; a convert himself, because if you read history, you will see the reference of his ';vision'; to combine Rome with Christianity, yet it also says he had his conversion on his death bed.
So, it was a political manuever, basically.
As a result, Catholic theology is a hybrid of Christian doctrine and Roman paganism.
For instance, there's no such thing as a ';Nun'; in the bible, yet there were ';Vestial Virgins'; in Rome paganism.
So they morphed into Nuns.
Also, one name for the Roman Emperor in pre-Christian times, was ';Pontiff';.
There was no pope from the time of Christ, until Constantine.
The Pope is really just the Christianized-Roman Emperor.
I could go on and on, but I'll spare you.
They have never heard the saying of the pot calling the kettle black.
probably because theyre not catholics and *know* that their sect is the right sect...i'm sure some catholics do the same
its a fundy thang
they strive to bring us down to their level. they are so very unbiblical its pityful. the bible itself is so clear that personal interpretation is not the way to understand scripture, but they do it anyway to their own destruction, as the bible says of these people.
the bible says nothing defiled shall enter heaven, yet they think that somehow their sins will leave no stain on their soul, forgiven but not atoned for sin requires a purification, they think Jesus dying on the cross is the answer to all their soul problems, they fail to realize if they do not cooperate with Jesus, who built his church for our sanctification they cannot be saved, because they refuse to be obedient servants, they prefer to be their own popes, their own masters, be obedient to none but themselves. the bible says the flesh of Jesus is real but they say it is a symbol, the man made traditions of protestants is abhorent, Im so thankful I aint one of them, but I realize only by the graceof God that I am not.
Jesus answered, ';I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.( John 14:6) This plainly says Jesus is the only way to heaven.Why do some Christians call Catholics false Christians? Do they have an ember in their eye?
Not necessarily.
Many of them are simply easily deceived, and the rest obviously don't care enough to learn the truth.
In today's information age, there's really no excuse for either position.
Anyone can do the authentic research and easily prove that the Catholic Church is everything Jesus set out to make it, and more.
The guys who claim to be ex-Catholics really crack me up. They're either liars or fools. Nobody really knows which. Not even them.
Everyone needs an enemy, it seems. Let Christianity destroy itself via petty disputes.
Christians who judge other for there beliefs are not real Christians. The Catholic church dose disagree with other forms of Christianity but it dose not judge them.
';Let he who is without sin cast the first stone';
Are they Christians themselves, eh?
Most people who call Catholics false Christians aren't Christians either.
Mandy957 is badly misinformed. Non- Catholic Western Christians believe that the bible is the only source of authority for what we are to believe. Orthodox and Catholic Christians believe that the bishops are that authority. These same bishops have defined what is to believed in the scriptures and in the General Councils of the bishops. Since Western Non-Catholic Christians have rejected the belief in a priesthood who still carries out the priesthood of Christ, they must reject the authority of the bishops and the General Councils.
I'm an ex-Catholic.
It's a long story, theologically, but I'll try to give you a condensed version.
The Catholic Church really is just what the Roman Empire morphed into, as a survival tactic.
Constantine created it, and wasn't ';really'; a convert himself, because if you read history, you will see the reference of his ';vision'; to combine Rome with Christianity, yet it also says he had his conversion on his death bed.
So, it was a political manuever, basically.
As a result, Catholic theology is a hybrid of Christian doctrine and Roman paganism.
For instance, there's no such thing as a ';Nun'; in the bible, yet there were ';Vestial Virgins'; in Rome paganism.
So they morphed into Nuns.
Also, one name for the Roman Emperor in pre-Christian times, was ';Pontiff';.
There was no pope from the time of Christ, until Constantine.
The Pope is really just the Christianized-Roman Emperor.
I could go on and on, but I'll spare you.
They have never heard the saying of the pot calling the kettle black.
probably because theyre not catholics and *know* that their sect is the right sect...i'm sure some catholics do the same
its a fundy thang
they strive to bring us down to their level. they are so very unbiblical its pityful. the bible itself is so clear that personal interpretation is not the way to understand scripture, but they do it anyway to their own destruction, as the bible says of these people.
the bible says nothing defiled shall enter heaven, yet they think that somehow their sins will leave no stain on their soul, forgiven but not atoned for sin requires a purification, they think Jesus dying on the cross is the answer to all their soul problems, they fail to realize if they do not cooperate with Jesus, who built his church for our sanctification they cannot be saved, because they refuse to be obedient servants, they prefer to be their own popes, their own masters, be obedient to none but themselves. the bible says the flesh of Jesus is real but they say it is a symbol, the man made traditions of protestants is abhorent, Im so thankful I aint one of them, but I realize only by the graceof God that I am not.
False eye lashes?
ok i bought false eye lashes.. i like how thick they are but they are way too long. is there a way i can cut them a little bit but not ruin them?False eye lashes?
I use grooming scissors for eyebrows, they are easier to control and are curved. Never use nail clippers or straight scissors.....False eye lashes?
yeah def. you could cut they just a little, make sure they are all equal. it will look fine. =]
use nail clippers to cut them to the size you want :]
you mean fake eyelashes?!
um..yahh u juss cut them to the perfect length..
hold them in place..and see how long u want them..
then hold ur finger at the right length..nd then cut them
with sharp scissors..make sure u cut them alll the same length..
muahSs;)
cut them with eye bro scissorsshort hair styles
I use grooming scissors for eyebrows, they are easier to control and are curved. Never use nail clippers or straight scissors.....False eye lashes?
yeah def. you could cut they just a little, make sure they are all equal. it will look fine. =]
use nail clippers to cut them to the size you want :]
you mean fake eyelashes?!
um..yahh u juss cut them to the perfect length..
hold them in place..and see how long u want them..
then hold ur finger at the right length..nd then cut them
with sharp scissors..make sure u cut them alll the same length..
muahSs;)
cut them with eye bro scissors
Are false eye lashes hard to remove and do u buy new ones every time u want to wear them?
i have never had them before and i wanted a new look for the holiday season and wondered if this was a good or bad idea?Are false eye lashes hard to remove and do u buy new ones every time u want to wear them?
You can go to a salon and have them put on..they last about a month.
A bit more expensive, but more natural looking.
IF you decide to go the ';do it yourself route'; Practice first and get the individual lashes instead of the full ones.
They are easy to take off..Ponds cold cream.
You can go to a salon and have them put on..they last about a month.
A bit more expensive, but more natural looking.
IF you decide to go the ';do it yourself route'; Practice first and get the individual lashes instead of the full ones.
They are easy to take off..Ponds cold cream.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder? True or false?
And why?Beauty is in the eye of the beholder? True or false?
true true true !
once you look into someone eyes, you see the beauty in them =)
hehe
Everyone has a different idea of whats beautiful. Everyone views things differently. basically, no one can tell you you're not beautiful because we all view beauty differently.Beauty is in the eye of the beholder? True or false?
To a certain extent, yes. I'll quote Per Gessle (swedish singer, was also a member of Roxette if you've ever heard about them?) anyway, in one of his song he says: Love is not blind, but it needs glasses.
When you get to know someone they become more beautiful in your eyes because their personality is shining through. The more you like someone the more beautiful they become.
Also, different people like different looks. A lot of times me and my friends don't agree on if some guy is good looking or not. I think it depends on what faces you saw when you grew up and became accustomed to.
/EDIT/ Fun Fact: the reason people often think they look bad on photos while other thinks you look like you always do, is that they don't see just you physical appearance when they look at it, they see your personality as well. When you yourself look at the picture all you see is your own appearance.
True because what one may think is pretty the other may think it is ugly. People, cars, houses what ever it may be.
True...don't know why! I mean I do but it takes a while to explain.
I think that is true.
true true true !
once you look into someone eyes, you see the beauty in them =)
hehe
Everyone has a different idea of whats beautiful. Everyone views things differently. basically, no one can tell you you're not beautiful because we all view beauty differently.Beauty is in the eye of the beholder? True or false?
To a certain extent, yes. I'll quote Per Gessle (swedish singer, was also a member of Roxette if you've ever heard about them?) anyway, in one of his song he says: Love is not blind, but it needs glasses.
When you get to know someone they become more beautiful in your eyes because their personality is shining through. The more you like someone the more beautiful they become.
Also, different people like different looks. A lot of times me and my friends don't agree on if some guy is good looking or not. I think it depends on what faces you saw when you grew up and became accustomed to.
/EDIT/ Fun Fact: the reason people often think they look bad on photos while other thinks you look like you always do, is that they don't see just you physical appearance when they look at it, they see your personality as well. When you yourself look at the picture all you see is your own appearance.
True because what one may think is pretty the other may think it is ugly. People, cars, houses what ever it may be.
True...don't know why! I mean I do but it takes a while to explain.
I think that is true.
Do you think Harry Reid(On the false Rush) story should pull the speck of dust out his eye before talking ?
Harry ';We already lost the war'; Reid should smack himself for saying Rush insulted troops and should apologize. Harry Reid's own feeling, actions, and words have done far more to demoralize our brave soldiers in Iraq than most anyone else could. Rush was probably cheered, and will continue to be cheered on by soldiers in our military for calling out phony soldiers who pretend to be something they aren't just so they can promote their agenda.
Reid and the rest of the liberals in charge, not all liberals here I respect the ones in the House and Senate who blasted Moveon, are on damage control mode right now because they were determined to make Iraq a failure, which hasn't worked out well for them since the surge, and try to look like pro-military types after refusing to condemn Moveon and George Soros for the Gen. Betray us ad.
America is waking up to the policies and hatred of the far left, and their also realising how much sway the far left holds on some of the democrats in power in Washington. It's only a matter of time before these far left, anti-American ';leaders'; are booted out by the people and that day can't come soon enough.Do you think Harry Reid(On the false Rush) story should pull the speck of dust out his eye before talking ?
I think he need to retire. His whole purpose is to put the other party down and doesn't contribute anything to the good of the people anymore.Do you think Harry Reid(On the false Rush) story should pull the speck of dust out his eye before talking ?
When I thought they could descend no further into the gutter after insulting the general, Harry Reid keeps surprising me with a willingness to lower that bar even further.
Carol should probably be forgiven for listening to the brain dead propaganda. Wow, it is sad though.
The problem with Harry Reid (as well as Jack Murtha) is that they only support free speech when they talk, yes Rush said fake soldiers, then clarified his statement to mention a single name.
Personally, I think that the soldier was a liberal media plant, interviewed to validate a twisted story to make it seem genuine.
With all of the brothels in the state of Nevada, it is little wonder that Reid is the whore of Congress, and Murtha is his PIMP
When a true genius arises you will know him by this sign: that all the dunces will be in confederacy against him. (Jonathan Swift).
Don't even get me started on harry reid. He makes me miss Tom Dasshole.
He is like a festering cold sore
exposing the underlying virus of neolibs...
He's nothing but hack job politician who the people Nevada should be ashamed of.
I am not sure what you mean about pulling the speck of dust out of his eye before talking, but if you mean apologize, yes.
Concerning %26lt;Carol%26gt;'s and Moderate-one's Profile's answers
You both are mistaken. If you don't listen to Rush, don't slander him. He does more good for this country than any other person on in media or in politics for that matter. I challenge both of you two listen to him for three weeks. He might be loud, opinionated and boisterous but it doesn't make him wrong. Yea, lets get rid of Rush then the government can really pull the wool over our eyes. I don't agree with him on everything he says, but he does care about what happens in this country. No one could be that passionate about politics, unless they did.
Yes because he didn't even bother to check out the facts before he attacked Rush.
The speck of dust out of his eye, the blinders off of his eyes, the fog out of his brain and the poison off of his tongue. This man is pure evil. He is out and out lying and he does it with knowledge of that fact and with a purpose to destroy someone who is a danger to the Dems and Libs because he has a podium from which to spread the truth. Rush Limbaugh has always supported the troops. If you know one thing about him, you know that, for sure. He was, when he made his statements, defending the honor of our soldiers who honorably serve and do so with pride and determination to represent our Country and preserve our freedoms. The ';non-soldier'; he was discussing was and is a liar and story teller. He didn't serve, he didn't win any medals, he didn't see all the atrocities that he chose to make up as if they were fact and then further the lie by publicizing it. The man never even made it out of boot camp!! He needed to be shown for what he is and Rush did just that. Harry Reid heard the entire conversation but chose to take it out of context and put a small portion out so it appeared as if Rush was saying something he never said. Fortunately for those who would take Reid at his word, those doubters can go and check out the archives of Rush's programs and hear the entire show. There is no doubt about what he was saying and why he was saying it. Instead of giving support for the truth and denouncing the liar, who IS a ';false soldier';, the Dems decided to further the lie and try to defame Rush, something they need to do to shut him down. What happened when Moveon went out and bashed a military hero and representative with their lies? Nothing at all!! (But, the public did not appreciate the way Petraeus was treated and let it be known.) Too bad for the Dems who refused to denounce Moveon. Made them look like a bunch of fools and it backfired. People need to wake up and they also need to speak the truth. Enough with the twists and lies. We don't need more liars to feed us the information that they want us to hear. There are too many ';socialists'; in high places and this needs to be resolved by voting them out and calling them on their dishonest representations. Enough, already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it's amazing how reid forgets everything ';he'; has said.....Harry Reid is a pathetica F(*%26amp;!!!!............... What's also great is the simple fact that alot of americans are starting to realize what the democrats are all out!!!
Harry Reid is a bug. An insignificant little bug with a big ego who unfortunately has risen to a position where he is dangerous.
I think it would be better if he pulled his head out of his as$ before talking.
Absolutely! I like how the liberals like to point out that Rush said McBeth's name TWO WHOLE MINUTES AFTER THE CONVERSATION! OH MY GOD! Maybe it occurred to Rush a couple minutes later that he had to acknowledge McBeth's name, because he probably knew in the back of his mind the far left idiots would try to spin this! And for them to point out it was two whole minutes later, just shows the kind of scrutiny that conservative radio talk show hosts go through. Everything they say is recorded and analyzed by these idots at Media Matters, Moveon.org and all the other far left smear organizations, searching for the golden snippet to allow them to smear, demonize and take the wind out of the conservative moments sail!
It is amazing that we would have a guy like this in a leadership position, especially during a time of war. Harry Reid could not lead a group of people out of a burning building and I believe that stroke he had ruined the two brain cells he had in the peanut head of his.
Harry Reid is a disgrace to this country
I thought that was a mud clot.
The speck out of his eye....his head out of his a... That man needs to go away and take that dream act crap with him.
Harry Reid ';can't handle the truth.'; That's why he has to twist the truth to suit his own needs, which is to fool the public. He has hit an all time low, as have the liberals in Congress. The liberals have low moral standards.
I have little use for Dirty Harry, but Rush has been slinging dirt for a long time, so maybe this time he too will have to be accountable for his words
I think he is right about Rush. Rush did say the comment and then added the name of the soldier about 2 minutes later. He needs to be taken down.
Reid and the rest of the liberals in charge, not all liberals here I respect the ones in the House and Senate who blasted Moveon, are on damage control mode right now because they were determined to make Iraq a failure, which hasn't worked out well for them since the surge, and try to look like pro-military types after refusing to condemn Moveon and George Soros for the Gen. Betray us ad.
America is waking up to the policies and hatred of the far left, and their also realising how much sway the far left holds on some of the democrats in power in Washington. It's only a matter of time before these far left, anti-American ';leaders'; are booted out by the people and that day can't come soon enough.Do you think Harry Reid(On the false Rush) story should pull the speck of dust out his eye before talking ?
I think he need to retire. His whole purpose is to put the other party down and doesn't contribute anything to the good of the people anymore.Do you think Harry Reid(On the false Rush) story should pull the speck of dust out his eye before talking ?
When I thought they could descend no further into the gutter after insulting the general, Harry Reid keeps surprising me with a willingness to lower that bar even further.
Carol should probably be forgiven for listening to the brain dead propaganda. Wow, it is sad though.
The problem with Harry Reid (as well as Jack Murtha) is that they only support free speech when they talk, yes Rush said fake soldiers, then clarified his statement to mention a single name.
Personally, I think that the soldier was a liberal media plant, interviewed to validate a twisted story to make it seem genuine.
With all of the brothels in the state of Nevada, it is little wonder that Reid is the whore of Congress, and Murtha is his PIMP
When a true genius arises you will know him by this sign: that all the dunces will be in confederacy against him. (Jonathan Swift).
Don't even get me started on harry reid. He makes me miss Tom Dasshole.
He is like a festering cold sore
exposing the underlying virus of neolibs...
He's nothing but hack job politician who the people Nevada should be ashamed of.
I am not sure what you mean about pulling the speck of dust out of his eye before talking, but if you mean apologize, yes.
Concerning %26lt;Carol%26gt;'s and Moderate-one's Profile's answers
You both are mistaken. If you don't listen to Rush, don't slander him. He does more good for this country than any other person on in media or in politics for that matter. I challenge both of you two listen to him for three weeks. He might be loud, opinionated and boisterous but it doesn't make him wrong. Yea, lets get rid of Rush then the government can really pull the wool over our eyes. I don't agree with him on everything he says, but he does care about what happens in this country. No one could be that passionate about politics, unless they did.
Yes because he didn't even bother to check out the facts before he attacked Rush.
The speck of dust out of his eye, the blinders off of his eyes, the fog out of his brain and the poison off of his tongue. This man is pure evil. He is out and out lying and he does it with knowledge of that fact and with a purpose to destroy someone who is a danger to the Dems and Libs because he has a podium from which to spread the truth. Rush Limbaugh has always supported the troops. If you know one thing about him, you know that, for sure. He was, when he made his statements, defending the honor of our soldiers who honorably serve and do so with pride and determination to represent our Country and preserve our freedoms. The ';non-soldier'; he was discussing was and is a liar and story teller. He didn't serve, he didn't win any medals, he didn't see all the atrocities that he chose to make up as if they were fact and then further the lie by publicizing it. The man never even made it out of boot camp!! He needed to be shown for what he is and Rush did just that. Harry Reid heard the entire conversation but chose to take it out of context and put a small portion out so it appeared as if Rush was saying something he never said. Fortunately for those who would take Reid at his word, those doubters can go and check out the archives of Rush's programs and hear the entire show. There is no doubt about what he was saying and why he was saying it. Instead of giving support for the truth and denouncing the liar, who IS a ';false soldier';, the Dems decided to further the lie and try to defame Rush, something they need to do to shut him down. What happened when Moveon went out and bashed a military hero and representative with their lies? Nothing at all!! (But, the public did not appreciate the way Petraeus was treated and let it be known.) Too bad for the Dems who refused to denounce Moveon. Made them look like a bunch of fools and it backfired. People need to wake up and they also need to speak the truth. Enough with the twists and lies. We don't need more liars to feed us the information that they want us to hear. There are too many ';socialists'; in high places and this needs to be resolved by voting them out and calling them on their dishonest representations. Enough, already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it's amazing how reid forgets everything ';he'; has said.....Harry Reid is a pathetica F(*%26amp;!!!!............... What's also great is the simple fact that alot of americans are starting to realize what the democrats are all out!!!
Harry Reid is a bug. An insignificant little bug with a big ego who unfortunately has risen to a position where he is dangerous.
I think it would be better if he pulled his head out of his as$ before talking.
Absolutely! I like how the liberals like to point out that Rush said McBeth's name TWO WHOLE MINUTES AFTER THE CONVERSATION! OH MY GOD! Maybe it occurred to Rush a couple minutes later that he had to acknowledge McBeth's name, because he probably knew in the back of his mind the far left idiots would try to spin this! And for them to point out it was two whole minutes later, just shows the kind of scrutiny that conservative radio talk show hosts go through. Everything they say is recorded and analyzed by these idots at Media Matters, Moveon.org and all the other far left smear organizations, searching for the golden snippet to allow them to smear, demonize and take the wind out of the conservative moments sail!
It is amazing that we would have a guy like this in a leadership position, especially during a time of war. Harry Reid could not lead a group of people out of a burning building and I believe that stroke he had ruined the two brain cells he had in the peanut head of his.
Harry Reid is a disgrace to this country
I thought that was a mud clot.
The speck out of his eye....his head out of his a... That man needs to go away and take that dream act crap with him.
Harry Reid ';can't handle the truth.'; That's why he has to twist the truth to suit his own needs, which is to fool the public. He has hit an all time low, as have the liberals in Congress. The liberals have low moral standards.
I have little use for Dirty Harry, but Rush has been slinging dirt for a long time, so maybe this time he too will have to be accountable for his words
I think he is right about Rush. Rush did say the comment and then added the name of the soldier about 2 minutes later. He needs to be taken down.
Eye contact is a sign that you like someone true or false?
whether it is true or false, you should. You can tell a lot from looking someone in the eye. I disagree that looking someone in the eye is rude. It depends on the context. If you are passing a stranger on the street, you might want to avoid eye contact. However, if you are referring to someone you love, looking at them in the eye is a sign of love. You can't try to answer the question based on personal experience. Psychology is a science. They measure variables and come up with an outcome. One interesting facet that has been based on empirical research is that one's pupils become enlarged when interacting with someone they love (or like).
So next time you are interacting with a loved one, look them in the eye.Eye contact is a sign that you like someone true or false?
FALSE! For me, I make eye contact with someone I respect, not necessarily like. Also, eye contact can mean that you're confident. Of course, you can also glare...Eye contact is a sign that you like someone true or false?
Not necessarily a sign, but it is sexy when there is chemistry.
yes very true........
no.
not all the time.
its a 50/50 thing.
maybe theyre being polite and looking at you while you talk.
maybe they are mezmorized by your hotness.
you can never tell.
thats like saying:
';is someone in love with me if they hold a door for me?';
True =)
that you have good communication skills, aren't shy with that person, want to look at their eyes, wondering what they meant, or what they are thinking, take them seriously, acknowledge them, and yes, like them.
Eye contact is not a sign that u like someone...eye contact held for a longer than usual period of time is.....
It's simply a sign that you're curious......who knows until you do more than that.
Not, always, someone might be shy and like someone, but not look at them.
Psychologists say true I say false. I was tought never to look sum1 in the eyes b/c it shows that you are challengeing them and that its rude. Now I cant ever look sum1 in the eyes 4 more then 2 seconds without having to look away. No mtr how much I want to.
Looking someone in the eye when speaking to them or listening is the proper thing to do. It does not mean that you like them. Eye contact from across the room would most likely mean someone has an interest in you.
So next time you are interacting with a loved one, look them in the eye.Eye contact is a sign that you like someone true or false?
FALSE! For me, I make eye contact with someone I respect, not necessarily like. Also, eye contact can mean that you're confident. Of course, you can also glare...Eye contact is a sign that you like someone true or false?
Not necessarily a sign, but it is sexy when there is chemistry.
yes very true........
no.
not all the time.
its a 50/50 thing.
maybe theyre being polite and looking at you while you talk.
maybe they are mezmorized by your hotness.
you can never tell.
thats like saying:
';is someone in love with me if they hold a door for me?';
True =)
that you have good communication skills, aren't shy with that person, want to look at their eyes, wondering what they meant, or what they are thinking, take them seriously, acknowledge them, and yes, like them.
Eye contact is not a sign that u like someone...eye contact held for a longer than usual period of time is.....
It's simply a sign that you're curious......who knows until you do more than that.
Not, always, someone might be shy and like someone, but not look at them.
Psychologists say true I say false. I was tought never to look sum1 in the eyes b/c it shows that you are challengeing them and that its rude. Now I cant ever look sum1 in the eyes 4 more then 2 seconds without having to look away. No mtr how much I want to.
Looking someone in the eye when speaking to them or listening is the proper thing to do. It does not mean that you like them. Eye contact from across the room would most likely mean someone has an interest in you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)